According to Working Group I’s report in the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the decadal average temperature of the Earth's surface between 2011 and 2020 is about 1.09°C higher than the average temperature of the first 50 years of industrialization between 1850 and 1900, which clearly indicates that it is necessary to actively aim for net zero carbon emissions/carbon neutrality in order to control global warming, which must not exceed 1.5°C.
In the face of highly uncertain climate risks and the global race towards net zero carbon emissions, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has proposed a framework for the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) to help companies manage climate change-related issues
We know that the risks and opportunities that climate change brings to a company should no longer remain at the basic stage of identification, and that the linkage between assessment and managed operation strategies is one of the most important issues for a company’s sustainable operation. Therefore, we have introduced the TCFD framework to analyze risks and opportunities in terms of policies and regulations, market and technological changes, and goodwill and substantive risks, and to develop adaptation and mitigation strategies, disclose financial information related to climate change, and improve communication with stakeholders.
Framework |
Strategies and Actions |
Governance |
• Board of Directors: review sustainability
management strategies, major action plans, risk management policies, annual
performance results, etc. |
Strategy |
• Based on the TCFD framework, we have identified 5 opportunities and 10 risks in
the short, medium and long term. |
Risk Management |
• Based on the scope and status of the impact of climate change, the substantive and transition risks are scored according to their frequency and severity, and are classified into different quadrants according to their scores. For items with high frequency and severity, management measures are formulated through interdepartmental discussions. |
Metrics & Targets |
• Climate change related management indicators:
• The relevant emission information has been carried out in accordance with The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol and ISO 14064-1- Greenhouse gases, and certificated by a
third party to measure the impact of climate change on the Unimicron's
operations. |
The relevant departments in the ESG Committee identify and analyze the potential climate change risks and opportunities within their business areas. Based on the occurrence probability (7 levels) and severity (5 levels) of each risk and opportunity, a matrix is drawn to capture significant risks and opportunities, and management methods are developed to reduce, transfer or avoid potential impacts. The results of the matrix analysis show that there are three risks having a position of high probability and high impact, that is, total amount control and emissions trading, average rainfall change, and the uncertainty of new regulations, respectively.
The carbon taxes, energy/fuel taxes and renewable energy regulations are considered as with medium probability and high impact. The four risks of extreme temperature change, rainfall pattern and distribution change, extreme rainfall and drought, and average temperature change are considered as with high probability and medium impact. In terms of opportunity points, those with relatively higher impacts or potential are production processes, low-carbon energy, water resource use, alternative or diversified resources, and logistics.
Source of Risk |
Type |
Possible occurrence Time |
Impact |
Measures |
||
High Probability X High Impact |
||||||
Total amount control and emissions trading |
Transition |
Medium term |
Shenzhen City, Mainland China, took the lead in launching carbon emissions trading in June 2013. Unimicron (Shenzhen) began to join the Shenzhen carbon trading mechanism in 2014. As we deal with more stringent carbon caps in the future and a carbon trading market that has grown more sophisticated since last year, the cost of carbon for our operations will increase if our operations and capacity increase in the future. If the scale of our operations and production capacity increase in the future, the carbon cost of operation will rise if our quota cannot cover our total carbon emissions. |
• Implemented inventory and continuous monitoring management in accordance with ISO
14064-1:2018 - Greenhouse gases standard to reduce carbon intensity. |
||
Average rainfall change |
Physical |
Short term |
Rainfall is mostly concentrated in some areas, leading to water shortages. |
• In the use and retention of water resources had been evaluated at the initial
stage of establishing each of Unimicron's facilities. Not only set up Storage tanks
but the water storage capacity of each regional reservoir and the water consumption
status of each plant is monitored and managed during normal times. |
||
The uncertainty of new regulations |
Transition |
Medium term |
Climate Change Response Act and Renewable Energy Development Act. |
• Continued attention to draft regulatory changes and assessments. |
||
Medium Probability X High Impact |
||||||
Carbon tax |
Transition |
Medium term |
• In the future, carbon fees will be imposed through Taiwan’s new Climate Change
Response Act, which will limit capacity expansion and increase operating costs. |
• Implemented inventory and continuous monitoring management in accordance with ISO
14064-1- Greenhouse gases standard to reduce carbon intensity. |
||
Energy
tax/ |
Transition |
Long term |
Energy tax/fuel tax would increase the costs of operation. |
• Continuously pay attention to the changes in laws and establish measures to
fulfill compliance requirements. |
||
Renewable energy regulations |
Transition |
Medium term |
The installation/use of renewable energy in Taiwan Facilities will increase the company's capital expenditure as required by the renewable energy development regulations. |
• Planning renewable energy and evaluating Solarstrom according to demand by 2030. |
||
High Probability X Medium Impact |
||||||
Extreme |
Physical |
Short term |
As the rising average temperature in the summer, to maintain the temperature and humidity conditions in the plant, more air conditioning systems need to be turned on to meet the production demand. |
• Improve the efficiency of the air conditioning system and add inverters with control, reducing energy use and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. |
||
Rainfall
pattern |
Physical |
Short term |
Rainfall ismostly concentrated in some areas, leading to water shortages. |
• Regularly monitor water shortage tendencies and develop contingency measures. |
||
Extreme |
Physical |
Short term |
If the number of typhoons landfalling in Taiwan decreases and the number of days without rainfall increases, water shortages will occur. |
• Regularly monitor water shortage tendencies and develop contingency measures. |
||
Average |
Physical |
Short term |
As the rising average temperature in the summer, to maintain the temperature and humidity conditions in the plant, more air conditioning systems need to be turned on to meet the production demand. |
• Improve the efficiency of the air conditioning system and add inverters with control, reducing energy use and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. |
Type |
Possible |
Impact |
Measures |
High Probability X Low Impact |
|||
Production processes |
Long term |
• The reduction of the product defect rate could reduce the cost of scrap |
• Implementing a circular economy to reduce carbon emissions and use of energy
resources |
Low-carbon energy |
Medium term |
Changing the fuel of boilers from fuel oil, diesel, etc. to cleaner natural gas that can effectively reduce the GHG emissions generated |
• We will continue to replace energy-consuming equipment and improve energy efficiency by 2025, and we plan to use renewable energy and solar photovoltaic facilities by 2030. We will continue to pay attention to the development of laws and policies to implement improvement plans to reduce carbon and save energy. |
Water resource use |
Short term |
Increase the efficient use of water resources that can reduce dependence on raw water |
• To recover water for manufacturing, monitor the quality of recovered water and reuse it in related systems to improve the recycling rate of water resources |
Medium Probability X Medium Impact |
|||
Alternative or diversified resources |
Short term |
Improve the climate resilience and risk tolerance of the supply chain to stabilize the supply chain |
• Assess and manage procurement risks through cross-departmental Supply Chain Management Subcommittee |
Logistics |
Short term |
Increase productivity by reducing the period of raw materials and equipment logistic |
• Route optimization |
Based on the results of the climate risk identification, Unimicron uses three different warming scenarios, namely RCP2.6, RCP4.5-6.0 and RCP8.5, to make parametric assumptions and financial impact estimates for the transition and physical risk factors. Among them, the risk factors are assumed to include carbon tax and the market. We make simulations with the changes in temperature and rainfall. In the simulations of all three scenarios, the financial impacts are mainly in the form of cost increase and revenue decrease.
Item |
Scenario |
|||
|
RCP2.6 |
RCP4.5-6.0 |
RCP8.5 |
|
Carbon Tax/ |
NT$ 280~2,800 /t-CO2e |
NT$ 100-300 /t-CO2e |
- |
|
Market share (%) |
Decrease 1%-5% |
Decrease 1%-5% |
- |
|
Physical Risk |
Degree |
+0.3-1.7℃ |
+1.6~2.5℃ |
+1.9~3.0℃ |
Raining (mm/day) |
4.54 mm/day |
4.55 mm/day |
4.42 mm/day |
|
The Aspect of Financial Impacts |
• Increased costs due to carbon tax |
• Increased costs due to carbon tax |
• Extreme weather causes damage to plant and equipment, thereby disrupting
operations |
Note 1: The Representative Concentration Pathways, (RCPs) are a method for capturing those
assumptions within a set of scenarios.
Note 2: RCP2.6 corresponding to a mitigation scenario with a very low radiative forcing level that
peaks at 3 Wm-2 (490 ppm CO2 equivalent) by 2100. The scenario is based on the
assumption that countries strictly control warming and actively reduce GHG emissions.
Note 3: RCP4.5~6.0 representing a medium stabilization scenario without overshoot pathway to 4.5
Wm-2~6 Wm-2 (650~850 ppm CO2 equivalent) at stabilization after
2100. On behalf of countries attempting to meet GHG reduction targets, GHG emissions remain
middle-to-high scenarios.
Note 4: RCP8.5 corresponding to a very high emission scenario with rising radiative forcing pathway
leading to 8.5 Wm-2 (~1,370 ppm CO2 equivalent) by 2100.
Note 5: Decrease in product market share due to increasing market expectation and demand for green
products.